
So, you do not want the team of experts at SGChK to relax your questions as seeds? Then formulate your awesome question and leave it in the comments to this topic! What is needed for this?
First you need to come up with a question.
In such a (or https://mindepositcasino.co.uk/minimum-deposit-1-pound-casino/ any other) way thoroughly question Recommended Send In this topic In the commentary.
Important additive: If the question is simple, for “blitz”, then Take a lot to do Well Full blitz: Select the topic, and select a couple more questions to him in addition. Blitz -It’s all the same Three questions, related to each other by a single topic-game, characters, some detail in the presentation or anything else.
An important addition 2: And a big request – No need to turn questions into textuals. Laconic and verified formulation is always better than a random pile of facts, which for the allotted minute experts will not even have time to digest.
Important add 3: The question does not have to be textual. It can be a picture, it can be a video question: technically it is realized. But before you are being easily, think carefully whether it will cost it?
An important addition 4: The task of the question is not to force experts to sit and frantically remember something from the depths of their memory, so Try to avoid questions in the spirit “Here is a description of the old and forgotten game, remember it”. The task of the question is to scatter “bread crumbs” around the experts, according to which they, with the help of logic, should reach the correct answer even if they did not play the very game, do not know the character. It is clear that there is always some basic cultural minimum that cannot be counted on, but there is no need to go into the wilds of Laura Starcraft and assume that everyone should remember who was the grandmother of Sarah Carrigan.
But do not rush to poke on the “Send” button, because the question is still It is worth attaching an answer (It is best to hide it under a spoiler, of course). And even more so – in addition Please write an explanation to the answer – how exactly the question “breaks up”, the more, the better. It seems to me that this will be useful not so much for me as for those who think over questions and will help immediately separate the category “Question about knowledge of a particular fact/name/date”.
An important addition 1: If a specific acts are involved in the issue, some news is mentioned, and any facts that are not so easy to knock out of Google (which is the rider on the griffin, some specific early art)-please get a lot to work for all similar things of Prufa. Otherwise several complaints were received about extremely specific actual errors in matters. We try to check them, but it is impossible to know everything about games, and it is almost impossible to google some things to google.
Then it remains only wait – Those whose questions will be selected will receive messages in a personal to clarify a variety of information. The rest, if possible, I will write something in the comments. We will collectively look at questions, correct and give advice, so that good issues are gaining on the next SGCH.
Read, comment, discuss! The final choice, of course, stands behind the Mr. Leading, but only in a constructive discussion is the truth is born, arguments are honed and formulations are polished!
I also have a new vision of game punishment. I do not want to invent one “execution” behind the scenes, and then she will fear the whole game, but I will tell you about the details of the new system in the game itself. Another thing is important right now – a set of ideas for punishment “from the audience” is announced openly.
1) The punishment can be implemented in any form – stream, video, podcast, song, drawing and so on. The only restriction is that preparation and creation should not take too many humanities (otherwise you are now giving a series of series, and who to work later then?);
2) the punishment should include joint employment of the entire team (5 people);
3) the most difficult thing – the punishment should combine the factors of punishment and at least dynamism, so that the process/result of the activity is interesting to observe;
4) The implementation is the last and boring, but an important aspect that does not come to mind, but the logic tells you to remind you that when you come up with a punishment, even if you are briefly think about what it should be realized (both from a technical point of view and from human)